“I think this is Name Administration Inc.’s 37th UDRP win in 15 years.

The company has had 1 inequitable loss which was overturned in the courts. The optics of trademark law are open to interpretation – one man’s trademark is another woman’s generic term.

Culturally (in the case of Name Administration) there has never been a malevolent desire to capitalize on marks, just a wish to administer a great portfolio of meaningful, resonant Internet real estate.

This is a World record the company would rather not hold. It’s an unfortunate reality that running a big-box store brings you great customers and less desirable people who think they can walk in and take your stuff for free.”

Sharing such information on UDRP cases is valuable, as domain investors can assess their options when hit with a frivolous claim, served with a C&D or have a UDRP filed against.