Which TLD dropped the most this year? The results might shock you!

When it comes down to absolute numbers, .com is king.

With more than 91 million registrations, dot com – one of the three original TLDs along with .net and .org – is ruling the domain registration waves.

The .com TLD increased its numbers by more than 7 million domains, or roughly 8.5% during 2010.

While most generic TLDs increased their caches as well, there is one TLD that recorded a huge drop since the beginning of the year.

Not all TLDs gained in 2010 - there is one big loser.

No, that TLD is surprisingly NOT .tel 😀 Let me repeat that: dot tel is not the big loser of 2010 in terms of numbers.

But allow me to extend the anticipation a little longer for you.

Of all the generic TLDs, .info recorded the biggest growth this year, with a staggering 28.4% increase since January. This is due to a number of promotions, practically giving away .info domains for as little as $1.99 – making .info the TLD of choice for cheap spamming.

Other details:

  • .net gained 7%
  • .org increased its numbers by 9.7%
  • .biz crawled up by 1.95%
  • .mobi inched up by 2.64%
  • .tel gained 3.6%
  • .eu received a 5.34% increase
  • .mea ccTLD often used as a novelty TLD – gained a hefty 22%

And who was the biggest loser of 2010?

That title goes to .asia – the only regional geoTLD in existence besides .eu 🙂

Losing 36,000 registrations that represent 16% of its numbers, dot .asia is unfortunately in the deep red for 2010.

Copyright © 2024 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.

Comments

13 Responses to “Which TLD dropped the most this year? The results might shock you!”
  1. Francois says:

    …the only geoTLD in existence … with .eu (Europe) and all ccTLDs 🙂

  2. Lucius "Guns" Fabrice says:

    Francois – you are right, I forgot .eu represents a region as well 😀
    C’est ma faute.

  3. Interesting, thanks for sharing.

    Wouldn’t .cat be a regional TLD as well?

  4. Lucius "Guns" Fabrice says:

    Nom de domaine – In theory, it is but technically, it isn’t; it’s a cultural and linguistic TLD with many restrictions.

  5. Richard says:

    Thanks for sharing the numbers, who doesn’t enjoy some name related stats with their morning coffee? Where’s the legend for random pie graph? 😀

  6. liror says:

    Interesting that .mobi just lost 2.64%

  7. Lucius "Guns" Fabrice says:

    Richard – If we had to invest in pie-graphics generating software we’d have to charge for the news 😀

    Liror – The figures above are all positive, .mobi gained 2.64% – the only TLD that lost from the ones listed is .asia

  8. kandyjet says:

    glad to see not a single .co has been dropped 😀

  9. Lucius "Guns" Fabrice says:

    Kandyjet – Dot .co is not a year old yet. The comparison only includes TLDs that existed in January 2010.

  10. jon says:

    …and .cn dropped half its registration base – some 6 million domain names.

  11. UsualCliche says:

    Interesting post…I figured it would have been .tel also but .asia sounds about right. Well I just wanted to comment on your post about .info being registered just for spamming. I think that is quite wrong and I have seen way more .info domains developed then quite a few other extensions. I just think you are being rather closed minded on .info domains and pigeon holing them into spam sites. Now to be completely honest I’m a .info investor so I guess you could say I took it to heart.

    Anyhow I enjoy the site and I try to read quite a few of the articles and such…I enjoy the flare you post with and most of the time I agree…”minus the .info=spam comment”

    Cheers

    Blake A. Worthington

  12. Lucius "Guns" Fabrice says:

    Blake – Unfortunately, the low promotional pricing of .info has given spammers and junk mailers a cheap tool for their practices. This is not a guesstimate, it’s based on the number of such registrations observed (many of which are trademark violations). Obviously, there are plenty of legitimate registrations of .info

  13. Uzoma says:

    Very useful article today. I like both the 100% articles and the humorous (0% ?) ones.

    Thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available