Redfield.com: Respondent won UDRP with a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking decision
Registered in 1996, the domain Redfield.com last sold for $8,158 dollars in late 2021, according to NameBio. Its registrant listed it for sale with an asking price of approximately $50,000 dollars. The domain appears to be a generic, two word compound of “red” and “field.” Meanwhile, Texas-based Academy Ltd. filed a UDRP to get the […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.Unicaf.com: Reverse Domain Name Hijacking decision—Here’s why
The domain Unicaf.com was hit with a UDRP and not as a Unicef typo, mind you. The domain is parked with PPC links and its Canadian registrant responded to the UDRP at the WIPO, noting that it was registered in 2011. Although Unicaf.com existed as early as in 2007, potentially as a Unicef typo, this […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.LOLO.com UDRP: Respondent laughs last; RDNH finding for Complainant
The Respondent in the UDPR filed against the domain LOLO.com had the last laugh. Registered in 1995, the domain appears to be listed for sale for more than $2,000,000 dollars. The Complainant is Lolo LLC, that asserted rights in the trademarks LOLO and LOLO GIFTS. The Respondent acquired the domain in 2019 as an investor […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.Homebuilder.com.au: UDRP ends with Complainant’s loss & Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
If you are a home builder in Australia, the ultimate domain name would be Homebuilder.com.au. The domain name was launched in mid December Down Under, all while it was hit with a UDRP just three days later. The Complainant, Homebuilder.com.au IP Pty Ltd, send out its lawyers to get the domain from another home builder. […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.SchwabFinancialCare.com UDRP: Schwab vs. Schwab in classic David & Goliath fight
Simon Schwab is a young entrepreneur who began providing loans to customers during the pandemic, using the domain name SchwabFinancialCare.com. Meanwhile, multi-trillion dollar financial monolith, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., filed a UDRP to usurp the domain name. The Respondent was represented by ESQwire.com and attorney Jason B. Schaeffer in particular. Note: ESQwire is a […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.GuaranteedRemoval.com: UDRP gets #RDNH finding; Complainant made misleading claims
Erase Technologies LLC filed a UDRP to usurp the aged, generic domain GuaranteedRemoval.com. The Complainant operates a business from the pluralized variant and alleged that it owns a registered trademark for GUARANTEED REMOVALS. Not so fast, said the Respondent: Respondent replies that Complainant has no standing to bring this Complaint because Complainant does not have […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.Matajer.com: Reverse Domain Name Hijacking finding after losing .net case
Just a month after losing the UDRP against Matajer.net with a finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, Majid Al Futtaim Properties LLC filed a UDRP against the .com variant, Matajer.com. As the first UDRP case established a negative foundation for the Complainant, why would they target the .com this time? Perhaps due to a victory […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.BeautyGarde.com rolls UDRP with a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking decision
Two French companies clashed at the WIPO over the domain BeatyGarde.com. The Complainant, Sothys Auriac, operates under the BEAUTY GARDEN mark. At first, it seems as if the domain is a typo of the Complainant’s domain and mark, only it isn’t. The Respondent owns the mark BEAUTYGARDE, where the word is “garde” and it means […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.Exxe.com: Turkish Complainant slapped with Reverse Domain Name Hijacking finding
A Turkish company is getting coal for Christmas, after filing a UDRP against the domain name Exxe.com. Registered in 1998, Exxe.com predates the Complainant’s domain name by 14 years. The Complainant’s claims that it began business in Turkey in 1997 were not supported by any evidence. The sole panelist at the WIPO declined to find […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.Matajer.net: BS claims by Complainant end with Reverse Domain Name Hijacking finding
The Complainant in the UDRP filed against the domain Matajer.net claimed that the Respondent’s use of WHOIS privacy constitutes “bad faith.” In doing so, Majid Al Futtaim Properties LLC attempted to downplay the Respondent’s use of the domain since its registration in 2006, claiming instead that the registrant changed in 2020. Not so fast, said […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.Tox.com: German company found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Tox Pressotechnik GmbH & Co. KG is a German company that filed a UDRP against the domain name Tox.com. Registered in 2001, Tox.com was offered for sale by its registrant for thousands of dollars; the Complainant in the UDRP offered a maximum of $24,000 dollars and when that offer was declined it proceeded with a […]
Copyright © 2025 DomainGang.com · All Rights Reserved.
